Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs in Waste!
Since 2001, Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme hosts the secretariat of the Dioxin, PCBs and Waste Working Group of IPEN (International POPs Elimination Network), and since 2008 it is an IPEN coordination center for Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) Region. We also coordinate important projects of the international campaign Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs (persistent organic pollutants).
It involved for example international monitoring of POPs in free-range chicken eggs, a project joined by NGOs from 17 countries, which resulted in three studies presented at the Stockholm Convention meetings: The Egg Report: Contamination of chicken eggs from 17 countries by dioxins, PCBs and hexachlorobenzene; The Next Generation of POPs: PBDEs and Lindane; and the last global report from 2009: DDT in Eggs – A Global Review. Arnika’s activities in this campaign on national level often overlap with activities of Toxics-Free Future campaign.What is the problem?
The Council of the European Union is going to decide on the limits for persistent organic pollutants (POPs) levels in wastes. These limits will be set as a lower limit (low POPs limit) and a upper limit (maximum POPs content limit and/or derogation threshold) - see Table 1. Waste between these two limits will be allowed to go to the appropriate landfills. Waste exceeding POPs levels of upper limit will have to go through destruction or irreversible transformation process. All wastes below the lower limit will not qualify as POPs waste and will be allowed to be used after solidification (which is not clearly defined) for construction purposes, for example.
EU upper limits are according to definition, comparable to low POPs content according to the Stockholm Convention, so we can expect that the EU will force the approval of its upper limits as the low POPs content limit according to article 6 of the Stockholm Convention, resulting in the global contamination by POPs - see this Comparison. If we look at the proposed levels the lower limit proposed under EU POPs Regulation are high, when we consider that these levels [of dioxins] in soils led to the critical contamination of the food chain in areas surrounding a waste incinerator in France and/or in footpaths around food producing areas in Newcastle where mixed (fly and bottom ash) waste incineration ashes were applied. More examples can be found on our hot spots map.
Comparison with current legislation in EU member states
The proposed limit values for POPs are far more permissive than current limits in EU Member States. For example: In
We believe that new proposals for POPs limits in wastes should not undermine existing standards. We suggest the following as more appropriate levels for POPs in waste in the Table 2 below.
Tables
Table 1: By BiPRO proposed limit for POPs values in waste according to the European Parliament and Council regulation 850/2004/EC
| POPs group | Low POPs Content Limits | Maximum POPs Content Limits |
| PCBs | 30 or 50 ppm | 2,000 ppm |
| POP pesticides | 10 or 50 ppm | 5,000 ppm |
| Other POPs (HCB) | 10 or 50 ppm | 5,000 ppm |
Table 2: By NGOs, deputies of local authorities and experts recommended thresholds for EU waste POPs content
| POPs group | Low POPs Content Limits | Maximum POPs Content Limits |
| PCDD/PCDF | 0.1 ppb | 0.5 - 1 ppb |
| PCBs in WHO-TEQ limits | 0.1 ppb | 0.5 - 1 ppb or to include their values under proposed PCDD/Fs |
| PCBs | 2.5 ppm | 10 ppm |
| POPs pesticides | 0.5 - 1 ppm | 2.5 ppm |
| Other POPs (HCB) | 0.5 - 1 ppm | 2.5 ppm |
Table 3: Health-Based Hazardous Waste Residue Concentration Limits in
| POPs substance | Concentration limits for residues (mg/kg) = ppm; |
| Aldrin | 0.00002 |
| Chlordane | 0.0003 |
| DDT | 0.001 |
| Dieldrin | 0.00002 |
| Dioxins | 0.00000006 |
| Endrin | 0.02 |
| Heptachlor | 0.00008 |
| Hexachlorobenzene | 0.0002 |
| Mirex/Kepone | N/A |
| PCBs | 0.00005 |
| Toxaphene | 0.005 |
